The Renovation and Transformation of Kenya’s State House: From Colonial Origins to Modern Controversy

Standing majestically on a three-square-kilometer estate in Nairobi’s Kilimani area, Kenya’s State House has been the seat of power for over a century. This architectural masterpiece has witnessed the transition from colonial rule to independence, hosted world leaders, and stood as a silent observer to Kenya’s most defining moments. Today, as the building undergoes its most dramatic transformation since construction, it finds itself at the center of a heated national debate about heritage, modernization, and national priorities.

The Colonial Origins: Building Government House (1907-1934)

The Vision Behind the Design

The story of what we now know as State House Nairobi begins in 1907, during the height of British colonial rule in East Africa. When the colonial administration decided to relocate the seat of governance from Mombasa to Nairobi, they needed an official residence befitting the Governor of British East Africa.

The task of designing this prestigious building fell to Sir Herbert Baker, one of the British Empire’s most celebrated architects. Baker, born in 1862 in Cobham, Kent, had already made his mark designing iconic structures across the British Empire, including the Union Buildings in Pretoria, South Africa, and would later work on New Delhi’s government buildings alongside Sir Edwin Lutyens.

Why Kilimani? Strategic Site Selection

The location for Government House was carefully chosen. Colonial planners selected the hilly Kilimani area for several strategic reasons. The elevated position provided natural defense advantages, commanding views of the surrounding landscape, and protection from the flooding that occasionally affected lower-lying areas of Nairobi. The site also offered cooler temperatures compared to the city center, a crucial consideration in the equatorial climate.

The Architectural Philosophy

Baker’s design drew heavily from Palladian and neoclassical architectural traditions, characterized by symmetry, proportion, and classical elements. The building featured distinctive red-tiled roofs, white Corinthian columns, symmetrical facades, and covered loggias that provided shade from the tropical sun. These design elements were not merely aesthetic choices but practical responses to Kenya’s climate while maintaining the grandeur expected of a colonial administrative center.

Baker’s architectural philosophy, influenced by his studies of Renaissance buildings in Kent and Norman cathedrals, emphasized the use of traditional materials like brick and stone. He believed in creating structures that would stand the test of time, both structurally and symbolically.

The Construction Phase: A Two-Decade Journey

While the initial design was completed in 1907, the actual construction of Government House proved to be a lengthy and complex undertaking. The foundation stone was laid by Governor Sir Edward Grigg in 1929, marking the official commencement of the main building works.

The construction supervision was entrusted to Scottish architect Arthur James Scott Hutton, who arrived in Kenya in 1926 as part of the “loan staff” of the Public Works Department. The term “loan staff” referred to professionals whose work was financed through loans the British Empire Government provided to the colony for public projects. At the time, the value of projects under Hutton’s supervision totaled 700,000 Sterling Pounds.

Hutton’s role was critical. While Baker provided the overall design vision, it was Hutton who oversaw the day-to-day construction, ensuring that Baker’s ambitious plans were faithfully executed. His attention to detail and construction expertise meant that the building was completed to exacting standards.

The project took over two decades to complete, finally finishing in 1934. The first occupant of the completed Government House was Sir Joseph Aloysius Byrne, who served as Governor of the Kenya Colony. The cost of construction caused considerable controversy in London at the time, with the £90,000 price tag drawing sharp criticism and debate in colonial administrative circles.

Baker’s Broader Legacy in Kenya

Government House was just one part of Baker’s extensive portfolio in Kenya. During his work in East Africa, he also designed the East African Railways Headquarters in 1927, featuring magnificent neoclassical architecture with three blocks built around a central quadrangle. The Law Courts building, completed in 1931, and the Prince of Wales School at Kabete were other notable Baker designs that still stand today as testaments to his architectural vision.

The Independence Era: From Government House to State House (1963-2000s)

The Transition of Power

When Kenya achieved independence on December 12, 1963, Malcolm MacDonald, the last British Governor, ceremonially handed over the Kenyan flag to Mzee Jomo Kenyatta at this very building. In this historic moment, Government House was renamed State House, symbolizing the transfer of sovereignty from colonial rule to the newly independent nation.

Initially, State House was designated as the residence of Kenya’s Prime Minister. However, when Kenya became a republic on December 12, 1964, and the position of Prime Minister was abolished, State House officially became the residence and office of the President of the Republic of Kenya.

Presidential Preferences and the Unused Mansion

Interestingly, despite its status as the official residence, Kenya’s founding fathers rarely used State House as their actual home. President Jomo Kenyatta preferred to live at his private residences in Gatundu and his Nairobi home, using State House primarily for official functions and daytime administrative work.

According to historical accounts, Kenyatta had personal reasons for avoiding overnight stays at State House. He reportedly feared that the building harbored the spirits of colonial governors and was uncomfortable with the sound of frogs croaking around the estate at night. This pattern of presidents choosing private residences over State House continued with President Daniel arap Moi, who also maintained his own homes rather than residing at the official residence.

State House as a Symbol of Sovereignty

Despite not serving as a lived-in residence for Kenya’s early presidents, State House remained a powerful symbol of state authority and national sovereignty. The building hosted crucial state functions, received foreign dignitaries, and served as the venue for major policy announcements and national celebrations.

The sprawling estate became more than just a building. It represented the continuity of government, the stability of the nation, and Kenya’s place on the world stage. Over the decades, State House Nairobi has witnessed and hosted some of Kenya’s most defining moments, including the signing of the Lancaster House Agreement in 1963, post-election peace talks during the 2007-2008 crisis, and the momentous signing of Kenya’s new constitution in 2010.

Global Leaders at State House

The prestigious address has welcomed an impressive roster of world leaders throughout Kenya’s history. American Presidents John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama have all visited State House. Countless African heads of state, European dignitaries, and international representatives have walked through its halls, making it one of Africa’s most significant diplomatic venues.

Multiple State Houses and Lodges Across Kenya

State House Nairobi is not the only presidential residence in Kenya. The government maintains a network of State Houses and lodges across the country to accommodate the President during official tours and provide secure venues for government business outside the capital.

The other major State Houses include State House Mombasa on the coast and State House Nakuru in the Rift Valley. Additionally, there are state lodges in Eldoret, Sagana, Kisumu, Kakamega, Kitale, Rumuruti, Cheran’gany, and Kisii. Sagana State Lodge, in particular, has been described as Kenya’s equivalent to the United Kingdom’s Chequers or the United States’ Camp David, serving as a retreat and alternative venue for high-level meetings.

The 21st Century: Maintenance Challenges and Initial Concerns

Decades Without Major Renovation

By the early 21st century, State House Nairobi had stood for nearly a century without substantial renovation. While routine maintenance had been performed, the fundamental structure and systems of the building remained largely unchanged since the 1930s. The building’s electrical systems, plumbing, roofing, and structural elements were aging, raising concerns about safety and functionality.

During President Uhuru Kenyatta’s tenure from 2013 to 2022, some refurbishment work began. Records show that in the final two years of his presidency, approximately KSh 10.7 billion was spent on refurbishment and infrastructure across the Office of the President, though this included various government buildings and not solely State House.

The Growing Need for Intervention

Architects and engineers who assessed the building noted that parts of the aged structure had become unfit for modern habitation. Issues included leaking roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems, structural weaknesses in certain areas, and the lack of modern security features required for a 21st-century head of state’s residence.

The building was designed in an era before air conditioning, modern telecommunications, advanced security systems, and contemporary office technology. Adapting the historic structure to meet current requirements while preserving its heritage value presented a significant challenge.

The Ruto Administration’s Controversial Renovation (2023-Present)

Launching the Major Overhaul

When President William Ruto assumed office in September 2022, the decision was made to undertake a comprehensive renovation of State House Nairobi and other presidential residences across the country. The project officially commenced in December 2023, with the President relocating his offices to a newly constructed pavilion on the grounds to allow work to proceed on the main building.

State House Comptroller Katoo Ole Metito defended the renovations before the National Assembly, explaining that the 117-year-old establishment had not been properly refurbished in more than a century. He emphasized that the building had reached what the Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi later described as a “point of shame” due to structural issues and deteriorating infrastructure.

The Scale and Cost of Renovations

The renovation project quickly became one of the most expensive government undertakings in recent memory. The initial budget for State House Nairobi was valued at KSh 1.77 billion, with completion expected by June 2027. By September 2024, approximately KSh 775 million had been spent, representing 44 percent completion.

However, the true cost appears to be significantly higher when accounting for all related expenditures. The 2024/25 national budget initially allocated KSh 195 million, which was later increased by KSh 600 million. In the 2025/26 budget, a further KSh 894.9 million was earmarked for State House upgrades, with the total allocation for presidential offices reaching KSh 2.3 billion.

The broader renovation plan extends beyond Nairobi to include all State Houses and lodges across Kenya, with a total budget of approximately KSh 10 billion allocated for completion by June 2027. Individual allocations for the 2025/26 financial year include Eldoret State Lodge at KSh 60.1 million, Mombasa State House at KSh 42.5 million, Nakuru State House at KSh 25 million, and various other lodges receiving between KSh 12.5 million and KSh 25 million each.

Security Agencies Take Control

A unique aspect of the renovation has been the involvement of security agencies. State House Comptroller Ole Metito revealed that the National Intelligence Service and the Department of Defence took over the refurbishment projects, with the Kenya Defence Forces serving as the primary contractor.

Former Defence Cabinet Secretary Aden Duale explained that the government could not award the construction tender to civilian contractors because State House is classified as a key security installation. The decision to use military engineers and contractors was justified on security grounds, though it also raised questions about transparency and public oversight of the massive expenditure.

The Dramatic Design Changes

As the renovation progressed, photographs released in January 2025 revealed that the transformation was far more extensive than anticipated. The most striking change was the replacement of the iconic red-tiled, hipped roof with a flat, modern roof design. The distinctive dormers that had characterized the building’s silhouette for over a century were removed, fundamentally altering the building’s appearance.

Other significant changes included the demolition of the historic wooden pavilion, replacement of the asphalt courtyard with grey cabro blocks, installation of new windows and flooring with modern finishes, removal of plants and landscaping features at the entrance, and the introduction of a minimalist facade that departed dramatically from Baker’s original Palladian design.

The transformation was so complete that many Kenyans expressed difficulty recognizing the building that had stood as an architectural icon for generations.

The Public Backlash and Architectural Controversy

The Architectural Association of Kenya’s Critique

The renovations sparked immediate and fierce criticism from heritage advocates, architects, and the general public. The Architectural Association of Kenya issued a strongly worded statement expressing deep concern over the changes.

Florence Nyole, President of the AAK, argued that the renovation had effectively become a redesign that stripped away the building’s recognition value. The association emphasized that State House, built in 1907 and designed by Sir Herbert Baker, is a neoclassical masterpiece that should be preserved rather than altered. The statement noted that despite State House not being officially declared a national monument, it qualifies as a structure of historical significance, having witnessed key moments in Kenya’s colonial and post-independence history.

The AAK criticized the alterations to the building’s iconic roofing, proportions, and symmetry, arguing that these changes diminish its historical essence. The association called for clear heritage protection policies and greater public consultation in future projects involving historically significant buildings.

Comparisons and Criticisms

Critics drew unfavorable comparisons between the renovated State House and other modern buildings, with some likening the new look to the red-brick architecture of Machakos County Hall. Others described the transformation as a “grotesque error of judgment” that amounted to erasing history.

Social media erupted with commentary, much of it negative. Ordinary Kenyans expressed dismay at the loss of the building’s distinctive character and questioned whether such a dramatic transformation was necessary or appropriate for a structure of such historical importance.

The Timing Problem: Austerity vs. Luxury

Perhaps the most damaging criticism centered not on the architectural changes themselves but on the timing and cost of the renovations. The project proceeded at a time when Kenya was facing severe economic challenges, with many citizens struggling with the high cost of living, increased taxation, and reduced government services.

In 2024, youth-led protests known as the Gen Z protests erupted across Kenya, opposing proposed tax increases in the Finance Bill 2024. The demonstrations turned deadly, forcing the government to withdraw the controversial tax proposals. President Ruto subsequently committed to implementing austerity measures, beginning with the Executive Office of the President, and pledged to eliminate allocations for items like the confidential vote, reduce travel budgets, hospitality spending, vehicle purchases, and specifically mentioned cutting renovations.

However, even as these austerity promises were being made, the State House renovations continued. Records from the Controller of Budget show that while no official budget allocations were made between June 2024 and December 2024 following the budget cuts, the construction work nevertheless proceeded, likely accumulating pending bills.

The apparent contradiction between the government’s austerity rhetoric and the ongoing expensive renovations fueled public anger. As one Nairobi resident put it, “With businesses closing and people losing their jobs, renovating State House can wait.”

Parliamentary Scrutiny

Members of Parliament also questioned the expenditure. Kisumu West MP Rosa Buyu criticized the spending, stating, “Kenyans are suffering and are being told to tighten their belts. The first belt to be tightened should be at State House.”

When State House officials appeared before the National Assembly Administration and Internal Security Committee, they defended the allocations while requesting an additional KSh 3 billion for State House to finalize pending projects. The committee heard that most of the State House budget goes toward recurrent expenditures, particularly personnel costs, as nearly 90 percent of State House staff are on contract and paid gratuities.

The Heritage vs. Modernization Debate

The Case for Preservation

Heritage advocates argue that State House Nairobi is irreplaceable. Built during a specific historical period by one of the British Empire’s most accomplished architects, the building represents a tangible connection to Kenya’s complex history. Its architecture tells a story that encompasses colonialism, independence, and national development.

Preservationists point out that countries worldwide protect and maintain historic government buildings precisely because of their cultural and historical significance. The White House in Washington D.C., 10 Downing Street in London, and countless other national landmarks undergo renovations that respect and preserve their original character while updating systems and infrastructure.

The concern is not about maintaining the building but about how it’s maintained. Heritage-sensitive renovation would involve preserving the external appearance and architectural integrity while modernizing internal systems, improving accessibility and functionality, enhancing security through non-intrusive methods, and upgrading electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems within the existing structure.

The Case for Modernization

Supporters of the renovation argue that Kenya cannot be held hostage to colonial-era architecture. They contend that the building needs to serve the practical needs of a 21st-century presidency, not exist as a museum piece. This perspective emphasizes that functionality, security, and modern requirements must take precedence over aesthetic considerations.

The government’s position, as articulated by officials, is that the renovations were necessary for several reasons including structural integrity and safety after more than a century without major updates, security requirements that couldn’t be met with the old design, functional needs for modern technology and workspace, and cost-effectiveness compared to building an entirely new structure.

Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi defended the spending, noting that the building had deteriorated to an embarrassing state with leaking roofs and outdated infrastructure that was unfit for hosting visiting dignitaries.

The Middle Ground

Some observers suggest that a middle path was possible. The renovations could have modernized the building’s infrastructure and systems while preserving its iconic external appearance and architectural features. Many historic buildings worldwide have been successfully updated to meet contemporary needs while maintaining their heritage value through careful, sensitive renovation approaches.

The controversy perhaps reflects deeper questions about how Kenya relates to its colonial past, whether preserving colonial-era architecture honors or celebrates that history, and how to balance heritage conservation with contemporary national needs.

Economic and Political Context

The Broader Budget Picture

The State House renovations must be understood within Kenya’s broader fiscal context. The country faces significant debt obligations, revenue collection challenges, and competing demands for public resources across education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social services.

The decision to allocate billions of shillings to presidential residence renovations while simultaneously cutting budgets for essential services struck many Kenyans as tone-deaf. The Controller of Budget’s reports showing expenditures of KSh 122.8 million in 2022/2023 and continuing allocations in subsequent years highlighted what critics saw as misplaced priorities.

Interestingly, in the second supplementary budget for 2024/2025, the Treasury initially pulled back KSh 1.5 billion originally allocated for State House renovations, apparently in response to public pressure following the Gen Z protests. However, subsequent budgets restored these allocations, with KSh 894.9 million appearing in the 2025/26 budget.

Transparency and Accountability Concerns

The involvement of security agencies in the renovation project, while justified on security grounds, has limited public transparency. The classification of State House as a security installation means that many details about the renovation including specific contracts, subcontractors involved, detailed cost breakdowns, and design decisions are not subject to normal public scrutiny.

Critics argue that this lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess whether taxpayers are receiving value for money and whether the project is being executed efficiently and without corruption. The government’s response has been that security considerations necessarily limit what information can be shared publicly, but that appropriate oversight mechanisms are in place.

Comparative Perspectives: Presidential Residences Worldwide

How Other Nations Handle Historic Residences

Looking at how other countries maintain their presidential or prime ministerial residences offers useful context. The White House in Washington D.C. has undergone numerous renovations since its construction in 1800, but each has been carefully managed to preserve its iconic appearance and historical integrity. Major renovations in the 1940s and 1950s completely rebuilt the interior while maintaining the external facade.

Similarly, 10 Downing Street in London has been continuously updated and modernized while preserving its historic Georgian appearance. The building incorporates state-of-the-art security and technology while maintaining its 300-year-old exterior.

The Union Buildings in Pretoria, South Africa, also designed by Herbert Baker, have been maintained and updated over the decades while preserving their architectural character. This demonstrates that Baker’s buildings can be successfully modernized without losing their essential character.

Lessons from Regional Examples

Within Africa, several countries have wrestled with similar questions about colonial-era government buildings. Some have chosen preservation, others modernization, and still others have built entirely new structures while maintaining historic buildings as museums or secondary venues.

The diverse approaches reflect different national priorities and relationships with colonial history. Kenya’s choice represents one path among many, though the execution has proven particularly controversial.

Looking Forward: The Completed State House

What Comes Next

As of late 2025, the renovations at State House Nairobi are reportedly nearing completion, with work expected to conclude in the coming months. The completed building will represent a decisive break from its colonial origins, with modern aesthetics replacing the Palladian grandeur of Baker’s design.

The practical question now is whether the renovated State House will better serve the needs of Kenya’s presidency. Will the modernized systems and security features justify the massive expenditure? Will the flat-roofed design prove suitable for Nairobi’s climate? Will the new aesthetic eventually become accepted as Kenyans grow accustomed to the changed appearance?

Implications for Heritage Conservation in Kenya

The State House renovation has broader implications for heritage conservation in Kenya. The controversy has sparked important conversations about the need for clear legal frameworks for protecting historically significant buildings, processes for public consultation on changes to national landmarks, guidelines for sensitive renovation of heritage structures, and education about the value of architectural heritage.

The Architectural Association of Kenya has called for the government to develop and enforce comprehensive heritage protection policies. Without such frameworks, other historically significant buildings may face similar transformations without adequate public input or professional oversight.

The Church Controversy

Adding another layer to the State House story, in July 2025, President William Ruto announced plans to build a church on the State House grounds using his personal funds. The proposal drew immediate criticism from various groups, including the Atheists In Kenya Society, which threatened legal action over what it termed “a promotion of Christian nationalism.” Nairobi’s Catholic Archbishop Philip Anyolo also urged clarification on whether the proposal would favor certain denominations.

The church proposal, coming amid the renovation controversy, further fueled debates about the appropriate use of State House grounds and the relationship between religion and government in Kenya.

Conclusion: A House Divided

The renovation and transformation of Kenya’s State House represents far more than a construction project. It encapsulates tensions between preservation and progress, colonial legacy and national identity, austerity and expenditure, and public interest and government prerogative.

From its origins in 1907 as the British Governor’s residence to its current incarnation as a modernized presidential palace, State House has been witness to Kenya’s entire journey as a nation. The building that Herbert Baker designed to symbolize British imperial power became, upon independence, a symbol of African sovereignty and self-determination.

The recent renovations have fundamentally altered that symbol, raising questions that Kenyans will continue to grapple with for years to come. Was it necessary to so dramatically change the building’s appearance? Could modernization have been achieved while preserving heritage value? Were the billions spent justified given competing national priorities? What does this transformation say about how Kenya values its architectural and historical heritage?

These questions have no simple answers. What is clear is that the State House that emerged from the 2023-2025 renovations is dramatically different from the building that stood for 116 years before. Whether this transformation proves to be a visionary modernization or a tragic loss of heritage will be debated by Kenyans for generations to come.

As the construction dust settles and the cabro blocks dry, State House stands ready to host another century of Kenyan history. The building may look different, but its role remains unchanged: to serve as the seat of presidential power and a symbol of the Kenyan nation. History will judge whether the transformation was worth the cost and controversy it generated.

For more insights on Kenya’s architectural heritage and modern construction trends, visit makaobora.com – your trusted source for construction industry news and analysis.